Celebrities Who Support Donald Trump

"Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo" (rustyvandura) 03/06/2016 at 20:22 • Filed to: None

0

20

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

PS9 > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 20:39

4

-Hates black people
-Hates muslims
-Get’s endorsment from the most famous black muslim in the US

You know that thing people say about not staring into the void for it stares back? I think this right here is what they were talking about...

samssun > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 20:40

0

dupe

TheOnelectronic > PS9 03/06/2016 at 20:42

7

That’d be like “Transgenders only exist to rape women in the bathroom” Ted Cruz getting an endorsement from Caitlyn Jenner.

Oh wait.

Sneaky Pete > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 20:42

2

Strange, you don’t hear about them screaming from rooftops that they’re voting for him.

Blondude > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 20:44

2

Aaron Carter

ranwhenparked > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 20:44

0

They left out Caitlyn Jenner.

samssun > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 20:45

2

Dennis Rodman, Tito Ortiz, Latrell Sprewell, Herschel Walker, Mike Ditka, and Lou Ferrigno make for an interesting cross section of the sports world.

Carl Icahn was unexpected. Forking over half to the government can’t be fun but most billionaires stop caring about income tax rates once they have wealth. And I guess Paula Jones has been on the receiving side of an actual “war on women” so no surprise there.

PS9 > TheOnelectronic 03/06/2016 at 20:46

5

In other news, Optimus Prime has endorsed Megatron for the presidency on the energon ticket.

Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo > ranwhenparked 03/06/2016 at 20:48

2

No, she’s a Ted Cruz supporter.

samssun > PS9 03/06/2016 at 20:50

1

Sounds like you get your news from Gawker. Like it or not, Trump’s call to close the floodgates would directly benefit blacks who make up higher shares of the unemployed and unskilled labor market.

And as mean as scaling back the freebies sounds, if you visit the slums in any urban center, it’s hard to argue that offering another generation of government dependency is compassionate.

Blondude > Sneaky Pete 03/06/2016 at 20:56

1

Shots fired!

Milky > samssun 03/06/2016 at 20:59

1

ranwhenparked > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 03/06/2016 at 21:01

0

Missed that news, I thought she had been a Trump supporter earlier in the season.

ranwhenparked > samssun 03/06/2016 at 21:02

0

I wouldn’t have expected Icahn either, although he is planning on keeping the Trump brand name on the Taj Mahal, so he apparently sees some sort of appeal there.

samssun > ranwhenparked 03/06/2016 at 21:04

0

My guess is it’s for corporate tax & regulation reform. Hard to be an activist investor if all the investments go to Hong Kong.

Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo > ranwhenparked 03/06/2016 at 21:06

1

Not much of a distinction.

PS9 > samssun 03/06/2016 at 21:23

1

Umm, floodgates? The actual level of illegal immigration in the US leveled off 10 years ago , and the presence of illegals in the US is at it’s lowest rate in over a decade. But hey, don’t let facts and reason get in the way of the narrative and fear mongering spun by the right wing media sources you obviously consume.

Trump’s call to close the floodgates would directly benefit blacks who make up higher shares of the unemployed and unskilled labor market.

That is a load of bullshit. Blacks (Like me, for example) are US citizens, and as such, are protected by the litany of labor and wages laws blanketing the US. They don’t have to settle for jobs that pay under the table at rates far below that of minimum wage. Additionally, it’s quite illegal to knowingly employ someone who is not a U.S. citizen aside from a specific set of circumstances (like a work visa, or an H1-B). Most major corporations are not willing to set their business models on fire for the chance to pay someone unfairly. The ones who are do so in industries where pay occurs under the table and the chances of being caught are slim (think construction and farm labor). Every other industry will expect to see proof of US citizenship or proof of your legal right to work in the US. Illegal immigrants are actually quite restricted in where they can find work, because they cannot compete for those jobs.

And as mean as scaling back the freebies sounds, if you visit the slums in any urban center, it’s hard to argue that offering another generation of government dependency is compassionate.

Urban? You’re going to need to qualify that term before I can respond to this.

samssun > PS9 03/07/2016 at 08:19

0

South and west Chicago. Huge sanctuary city, complete blind eye to illegal aliens. Huge black neighborhoods of unskilled/semi-skilled with sky high unemployment rates. To ignore the link is baffling.

Yes I know they’re supposed to become Java developers at Facebook, but since the 17k/year spent at Chicago Public Schools hasn’t quite prepped everyone, there’s a large population whose best available option is (or would be) manual/unskilled labor.

PS9 > samssun 03/07/2016 at 12:46

0

South and west Chicago. Huge sanctuary city, complete blind eye to illegal aliens. Huge black neighborhoods of unskilled/semi-skilled with sky high unemployment rates. To ignore the link is baffling.

It’s easy to ‘ignore the link’ when you don’t provide any empirical substance to your assertions. A mere correlation is not enough. That it is convenient to your political ideals is not enough. You cannot hint-hint, wink-wink that into an observation that can withstand scrutiny and criticism.

It is a requirement that every major employer in the US must provide proof that their employees are legal residents of the US. Given that - as I am pointing out for the second time - it is quite illegal to knowingly employ an undocumented immigrant . The only sectors of the economy that do it are under-the-table pay jobs where they think they can get away with it. If you are an illegal immigrant in Chicago (or New York, Orlando, or anywhere else in the united states), you can take every single major and minor corporation off your list of potential employers, as they will not touch you. Your only options for employment are under-the-table pay jobs that do not document who is working for them.

An African american, or otherwise legal resident of the United States, even without any degree or trade certification, even without a High School Diploma , can still apply at the many major corporations that surround Chicago and fulfill the requirements of being a legal US resident. Because of this, they have access to tens of thousands of job opportunities an illegal can never get, which is why the idea that blacks and illegals are competing for the same jobs is bullshit.

The idea that employers who don’t pay their workers under the table do everything they can to keep from employing illegals may not be convenient to your political ideals, but that is what is happening. Major corporations like FedEx don’t get to gloss over that reality, so I don’t think you should get to either.

Also? Illegal immigration is down, still. At the lowest levels they’ve been in a decade, still. Trump is ten years too late to the table. That giant wall no one’s going to pay for is already obsolete.

samssun > PS9 03/07/2016 at 20:06

0

If you'd spent any time in these neighborhoods, you'd realize that major corporations are not the bulk of employers. For every megacorp there are countless small shops, storefronts, seasonal gigs, work crews, etc. The idea that this city has anything approaching rigorous immigration employment is ridiculous.